B- Infrastructure Level

ROADS — Infrastructure Allocation Model

ROADS

Total Infrastructure: $5.41 Trillion
Roads Allocation: $1.622 Trillion
Roads Share: 30.00%
Allocation Method: Variable Category-Specific Allocation Percentage
There is no universal state percentage. Each infrastructure category generates its own independent 50-state distribution.
State × Infrastructure Category = Variable Allocation Percentage
Roads-specific factors are independently calculated and normalized to 100%.
B− HIGHLIGHT RULE: B− Yellow identifies a state that is already at the B− target grade and therefore does not require additional funding to reach B−.

Source terminology retained: The supplied Roads Master Table identifies the benchmark as “Needed for B” and the funding difference as “Gap Difference.”
State Current Grade Current Roads Spending Needed for B Gap Difference % National Current Spending
Alabama D+ $18B $30B $12B 1.00%
Alaska C− $9B $15B $6B 0.50%
Arizona D+ $27B $45B $18B 1.50%
Arkansas C $9B $15B $6B 0.50%
California D $225B $375B $150B 12.50%
Colorado C− $18B $30B $12B 1.00%
Connecticut D+ $9B $15B $6B 0.50%
Delaware C− $9B $15B $6B 0.50%
Florida C+ $108B $180B $72B 6.00%
Georgia C+ $45B $75B $30B 2.50%
Hawaii D+ $9B $15B $6B 0.50%
Idaho C− $9B $15B $6B 0.50%
Illinois D+ $63B $105B $42B 3.50%
Indiana C− $27B $45B $18B 1.50%
Iowa C $9B $15B $6B 0.50%
Kansas C− $9B $15B $6B 0.50%
Kentucky C− $9B $15B $6B 0.50%
Louisiana D+ $18B $30B $12B 1.00%
Maine D+ $9B $15B $6B 0.50%
Maryland C $27B $45B $18B 1.50%
Massachusetts D+ $27B $45B $18B 1.50%
Michigan D− $36B $60B $24B 2.00%
Minnesota C $18B $30B $12B 1.00%
Mississippi D+ $9B $15B $6B 0.50%
Missouri D+ $18B $30B $12B 1.00%
Montana C− $9B $15B $6B 0.50%
Nebraska C $9B $15B $6B 0.50%
Nevada C $9B $15B $6B 0.50%
New Hampshire C− $9B $15B $6B 0.50%
New Jersey D+ $36B $60B $24B 2.00%
New Mexico D+ $9B $15B $6B 0.50%
New York D+ $90B $150B $60B 5.00%
North Carolina C $45B $75B $30B 2.50%
North Dakota C $9B $15B $6B 0.50%
Ohio D+ $54B $90B $36B 3.00%
Oklahoma D+ $9B $15B $6B 0.50%
Oregon C− $9B $15B $6B 0.50%
Pennsylvania C− $72B $120B $48B 4.00%
Rhode Island D− $9B $15B $6B 0.50%
South Carolina D $18B $30B $12B 1.00%
South Dakota C $9B $15B $6B 0.50%
Tennessee C $27B $45B $18B 1.50%
Texas D $180B $300B $120B 10.00%
Utah C+ $9B $15B $6B 0.50%
Vermont C $9B $15B $6B 0.50%
Virginia C $36B $60B $24B 2.00%
Washington C− $27B $45B $18B 1.50%
West Virginia D $9B $15B $6B 0.50%
Wisconsin D+ $18B $30B $12B 1.00%
Wyoming C $9B $15B $6B 0.50%
TOTAL $1.800T $3.000T $1.200T 100.00%
Roads Source Note:
The supplied Roads Master Table uses the fields Current Roads Spending, Needed for B, Gap Difference, % National Current Spending, and Current ASCE Road Grade. The source values have been retained without changing the underlying data. :contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}

B− Highlight: No state in the supplied Roads table has a current B− grade, so there are currently no yellow state rows.


HAZARDOUS WASTE — STATE INFRASTRUCTURE GRADE & B− FUNDING GAP

Total Infrastructure: $5.41T
Hazardous Waste Allocation: $21.64B
Hazardous Waste Share: 0.40%
Target Infrastructure Grade: B−
Allocation Method: Variable Category-Specific Allocation Percentage
Each state's Hazardous Waste grade and funding requirement are independently modeled using category-specific infrastructure, hazardous-waste management, treatment/disposal capacity, remediation, regulatory, and related infrastructure indicators.
Funding Gap Formula: B− Funding Requirement − Current Estimated Spending = Additional Spending Needed
Percentage Increase: Additional Spending Needed ÷ Current Estimated Spending × 100
Yellow = State already at B−; no additional funding required to reach B−.
State Current Grade Current Spending B− Requirement Additional Spending % Increase
AlabamaC+$0.487B$0.657B$0.170B35.0%
AlaskaC$0.121B$0.212B$0.091B75.0%
ArizonaC+$0.322B$0.435B$0.113B35.0%
ArkansasC$0.344B$0.602B$0.258B75.0%
CaliforniaC+$1.374B$1.855B$0.481B35.0%
Colorado B− $0.299B $0.299B $0.000B 0.0%
ConnecticutC+$0.234B$0.316B$0.082B35.0%
DelawareC$0.167B$0.292B$0.125B75.0%
FloridaC+$0.675B$0.911B$0.236B35.0%
GeorgiaC+$0.522B$0.705B$0.183B35.0%
HawaiiC$0.100B$0.175B$0.075B75.0%
IdahoC+$0.188B$0.254B$0.066B35.0%
IllinoisC+$0.920B$1.242B$0.322B35.0%
IndianaC+$0.565B$0.763B$0.198B35.0%
IowaC+$0.322B$0.435B$0.113B35.0%
KansasC$0.288B$0.504B$0.216B75.0%
KentuckyC+$0.444B$0.599B$0.155B35.0%
LouisianaC$0.721B$1.262B$0.541B75.0%
MaineC+$0.121B$0.163B$0.042B35.0%
MarylandC+$0.366B$0.494B$0.128B35.0%
MassachusettsC+$0.409B$0.552B$0.143B35.0%
MichiganC+$0.742B$1.002B$0.260B35.0%
MinnesotaC+$0.366B$0.494B$0.128B35.0%
MississippiC$0.299B$0.523B$0.224B75.0%
MissouriC+$0.498B$0.672B$0.174B35.0%
MontanaC$0.167B$0.292B$0.125B75.0%
NebraskaC+$0.234B$0.316B$0.082B35.0%
NevadaC+$0.234B$0.316B$0.082B35.0%
New HampshireC+$0.121B$0.163B$0.042B35.0%
New JerseyC$0.664B$1.162B$0.498B75.0%
New MexicoC$0.199B$0.348B$0.149B75.0%
New YorkC+$1.065B$1.438B$0.373B35.0%
North CarolinaC+$0.610B$0.824B$0.214B35.0%
North DakotaC$0.167B$0.292B$0.125B75.0%
OhioC+$0.887B$1.197B$0.310B35.0%
OklahomaC+$0.387B$0.522B$0.135B35.0%
OregonC+$0.299B$0.404B$0.105B35.0%
PennsylvaniaC+$0.963B$1.300B$0.337B35.0%
Rhode IslandC+$0.100B$0.135B$0.035B35.0%
South CarolinaC+$0.409B$0.552B$0.143B35.0%
South DakotaC$0.121B$0.212B$0.091B75.0%
TennesseeC+$0.543B$0.733B$0.190B35.0%
TexasC$1.385B$2.424B$1.039B75.0%
UtahC+$0.245B$0.331B$0.086B35.0%
VermontC+$0.078B$0.105B$0.027B35.0%
VirginiaC+$0.487B$0.657B$0.170B35.0%
WashingtonC+$0.465B$0.628B$0.163B35.0%
West VirginiaC$0.322B$0.564B$0.242B75.0%
WisconsinC+$0.487B$0.657B$0.170B35.0%
WyomingC$0.110B$0.193B$0.083B75.0%
50-STATE TOTAL $21.643B $31.183B $9.540B 44.1%

HAZARDOUS WASTE — REGIONAL B− FUNDING GAP

Region Current Spending B− Requirement Additional Spending
Northeast $4.288B $6.120B $1.832B
Midwest $5.597B $7.786B $2.189B
South $7.635B $11.535B $3.900B
West $4.123B $5.742B $1.619B
TOTAL $21.643B $31.183B $9.540B
Legend: B− — Already meets target

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Storm Shield Strategy Simulation — Official Simulation Engine

Transit Infrastructure Grades (Quality Rankings)

State Wastewater Infrastructure Grades (Quality Rankings)