Clickable Bridges Table

Bridges 50-State Clickable Master Table

Bridges — 50-State Clickable Master Table

Complete State-by-State Bridges Infrastructure Allocation
ASCE National Bridges Grade: C — 2025 SOURCE
STATE TITLE ↕CURRENT BRIDGES SPENDING ↕% NATIONAL CURRENT SPENDING ↕ADDITIONAL SPENDING NEEDED FOR B− ↕GRADE ↕
Alabama$3.41B2.069%$11.77BC-
Alaska$2.74B1.663%$11.77BC-
Arizona$3.33B2.021%$8.24BC
Arkansas$2.74B1.663%$11.77BC-
California$4.03B2.442%$4.71BC+
Colorado$3.47B2.102%$4.71BC+
Connecticut$3.47B2.102%$4.71BC+
Delaware$3.47B2.102%$4.71BC+
Florida$4.03B2.442%$4.71BC+
Georgia$3.70B2.242%$4.71BC+
Hawaii$2.97B1.801%$4.71BC+
Idaho$2.74B1.663%$11.77BC-
Illinois$4.03B2.442%$4.71BC+
Indiana$3.70B2.242%$4.71BC+
Iowa$2.74B1.663%$11.77BC-
Kansas$2.74B1.663%$11.77BC-
Kentucky$3.56B2.155%$8.24BC
Louisiana$3.56B2.155%$8.24BC
Maine$2.74B1.663%$11.77BC-
Maryland$3.47B2.102%$4.71BC+
Massachusetts$3.47B2.102%$4.71BC+
Michigan$3.70B2.242%$4.71BC+
Minnesota$3.47B2.102%$4.71BC+
Mississippi$2.74B1.663%$11.77BC-
Missouri$3.56B2.155%$8.24BC
Montana$2.74B1.663%$11.77BC-
Nebraska$2.74B1.663%$11.77BC-
Nevada$3.47B2.102%$4.71BC+
New Hampshire$3.18B1.924%$8.24BC
New Jersey$3.18B1.924%$8.24BC
New Mexico$3.18B1.924%$8.24BC
New York$3.18B1.924%$8.24BC
North Carolina$3.18B1.924%$8.24BC
North Dakota$3.18B1.924%$8.24BC
Ohio$4.03B2.442%$4.71BC+
Oklahoma$2.86B1.732%$8.24BC
Oregon$3.47B2.102%$4.71BC+
Pennsylvania$4.03B2.442%$4.71BC+
Rhode Island$3.18B1.924%$8.24BC
South Carolina$3.18B1.924%$8.24BC
South Dakota$3.18B1.924%$8.24BC
Tennessee$3.70B2.242%$4.71BC+
Texas$4.03B2.442%$4.71BC+
Utah$2.97B1.801%$4.71BC+
Vermont$2.74B1.663%$11.77BC-
Virginia$2.97B1.801%$4.71BC+
Washington$3.47B2.102%$4.71BC+
West Virginia$3.18B1.924%$8.24BC
Wisconsin$3.70B2.242%$4.71BC+
Wyoming$2.74B1.663%$11.77BC-
50 / 50 STATES POPULATED — Every state title is explicitly included.
SOURCE / MODEL NOTICE: ASCE's 2025 Bridges grade is C. ASCE reports 623,000+ bridges and a 2024–33 investment need of $538B, with $165B funded and a $373B gap. The 50-state grades and Bridges-specific allocation multipliers are model inputs, not ASCE-published state allocations.
Variable Category-Specific Allocation Percentage: Each state's Bridges percentage is independently normalized from its Bridges grade weight × Bridges-specific multiplier. No other category's allocation pattern is copied.

BRIDGES GRADE
CURRENT SPENDING
ADDITIONAL NEEDED FOR B−
NATIONAL SHARE

Comments

New comments are not allowed.

Popular posts from this blog

Storm Shield Strategy Simulation — Official Simulation Engine

Image
Copy Interactive Post -        Paste In Copilot          Copilot permits interactive answers and scoring.    Copy Text.  # 🌊 STORM SHIELD STRATEGY SIMULATION — UNIVERSAL INTERACTIVE ROUND TEMPLATE # (Reusable for ALL PHASES / ROUNDS — no examples, no previous data) # ROUND N — INTERACTIVE ENGINE --- ## STEP 1 — PROJECT ASSIGNMENT Copilot loads the round’s scenario and provides: - Base Score (0–100 master score framework) - Starting Budget (current approved budget level) - Current Cost Estimate - Overrun Percentage - National Impact Context (local vs national economic security) - Phase Context (e.g., Build / Financing / Contracts / Audit / Environment / Port / Real Estate / Climate / Storm Test / Final Construction / Maintenance) **User Action:** None — Copilot initializes the round. --- ## STEP 2 — RISK & COST BASELINE Copilot lists the round’s risk and cost conditions and sets: - Starting Score - Safety / Economic / Cost ...
Read more

Transit Infrastructure Grades (Quality Rankings)

Image
Aging vehicles — Old fleets causing breakdowns, delays, high costs, poor reliability. Station deterioration — Worn stations reducing safety, accessibility, comfort, and service quality. Maintenance backlogs — Deferred repairs increasing failures, costs, and operational disruptions. Capacity limitations — Insufficient service unable to meet rider demand or growth. Accessibility needs — Missing ADA features restricting mobility for disabled and elderly riders. 🚇 U.S. Transit Infrastructure Tier System (Quality Rankings) Based on Updated Transit Grades You Provided 🟢 TOP TIER — C / C− (Above National Baseline) States with relatively stronger transit systems, lower additional funding gaps, and better operational stability. California — C− Colorado — C− Connecticut — C− Illinois — C− Massachusetts — C− New Hampshire — C− New Jersey — C− ...
Read more

Clickable Transit Table

Transit — 50-State Clickable Master Table — ASCE Maryland Corrected Transit — 50-State Clickable Master Table ASCE State Grade Corrections • D+ National Average • Variable Category-Specific Allocation NATIONAL TRANSIT AVERAGE: D+ — 67.0 ASCE SOURCE 50-STATE MODEL AVERAGE 65.6 — D+ MARYLAND ASCE TRANSIT D+ NEW YORK ASCE TRANSIT D+ B− OR BETTER 0 STATES Reset STATE TITLE ↕ CURRENT TRANSIT SPENDING ↕ % NATIONAL CURRENT SPENDING ↕ ADDITIONAL SPENDING NEEDED FOR B− ↕ GRADE ↕ Alabama $9.42B 2.021% $3.29B D Alaska $8.70B 1.867% $2.93B D Arizona $8.71B 1.868% $2.56B D+ Arkansas $9.44B 2.027% $3.51B D- California $8.79B 1.886% $1.97B C- Colorado $8.63B 1.853% $2.26B C- Connecticut $8.06B 1.729% $1.81B C- Delaware $7.70B 1.653% $2.15B D+ Florida $10.05B 2.156% $2.96B D+ Georgia $9.78B 2.100% $3.16B D Hawaii $8.70B 1.867% $2.93B D Idaho $8.95B 1.920% $3.12B D Illinois $9.10B 1.954% $2.22B C- Indiana $9.52B 2.043% $3.21B D Iowa $8.95B 1.92...
Read more