Clickable Dams Table

Dams — 50-State Clickable Master Table

Dams — 50-State Clickable Master Table

Complete State-by-State Dams Infrastructure Allocation
ASCE National Dams Grade: D+ — 2025 SOURCE
STATE TITLE ↕ CURRENT DAMS
SPENDING ↕		 % NATIONAL
CURRENT SPENDING ↕		 ADDITIONAL SPENDING
NEEDED FOR B− ↕		 DAMS
GRADE ↕
Alabama$0.39B1.964%$5.65BD+
Alaska$0.33B1.651%$3.76BC-
Arizona$0.39B1.927%$3.76BC-
Arkansas$0.42B2.110%$3.76BC-
California$0.48B2.389%$2.63BC
Colorado$0.40B2.007%$2.63BC
Connecticut$0.40B2.007%$2.63BC
Delaware$0.39B1.927%$3.76BC-
Florida$0.48B2.389%$2.63BC
Georgia$0.44B2.198%$2.63BC
Hawaii$0.33B1.651%$3.76BC-
Idaho$0.33B1.651%$3.76BC-
Illinois$0.44B2.198%$2.63BC
Indiana$0.42B2.110%$3.76BC-
Iowa$0.39B1.927%$3.76BC-
Kansas$0.39B1.927%$3.76BC-
Kentucky$0.39B1.964%$5.65BD+
Louisiana$0.42B2.110%$3.76BC-
Maine$0.33B1.651%$3.76BC-
Maryland$0.40B2.007%$2.63BC
Massachusetts$0.40B2.007%$2.63BC
Michigan$0.44B2.198%$2.63BC
Minnesota$0.44B2.198%$2.63BC
Mississippi$0.39B1.927%$3.76BC-
Missouri$0.44B2.198%$2.63BC
Montana$0.33B1.651%$3.76BC-
Nebraska$0.39B1.927%$3.76BC-
Nevada$0.33B1.651%$3.76BC-
New Hampshire$0.33B1.651%$3.76BC-
New Jersey$0.40B2.007%$2.63BC
New Mexico$0.39B1.927%$3.76BC-
New York$0.48B2.389%$2.63BC
North Carolina$0.44B2.198%$2.63BC
North Dakota$0.33B1.651%$3.76BC-
Ohio$0.48B2.389%$2.63BC
Oklahoma$0.42B2.110%$3.76BC-
Oregon$0.44B2.198%$2.63BC
Pennsylvania$0.48B2.389%$2.63BC
Rhode Island$0.33B1.651%$3.76BC-
South Carolina$0.39B1.927%$3.76BC-
South Dakota$0.33B1.651%$3.76BC-
Tennessee$0.44B2.198%$2.63BC
Texas$0.48B2.389%$2.63BC
Utah$0.40B2.007%$2.63BC
Vermont$0.33B1.651%$3.76BC-
Virginia$0.44B2.198%$2.63BC
Washington$0.48B2.389%$2.63BC
West Virginia$0.33B1.651%$3.76BC-
Wisconsin$0.44B2.198%$2.63BC
Wyoming$0.33B1.651%$3.76BC-
50 / 50 STATES POPULATED — Every state title is explicitly included.
SOURCE / MODEL NOTICE: ASCE's 2025 national Dams grade is D+. ASCE's national investment table reports $185B in Dams needs, $20B funded for 2024–33, and a published $166B funding gap. The 50-state grades and Dam-specific allocation multipliers are model inputs and are not represented as an ASCE-published 50-state allocation dataset.
$5.41T National Infrastructure • Dams funded: $20B • Dams needs: $185B • ASCE funding gap: $166B
Variable Category-Specific Allocation Percentage: Each state's Dams percentage is calculated independently from the Dams grade weight × Dams-specific multiplier and normalized so all 50 states equal 100%. No Transit, Rail, Ports, Aviation, Water, Wastewater, Stormwater, Public Parks, or another category's percentage pattern is copied.
DAMS GRADE
CURRENT DAMS SPENDING
ADDITIONAL NEEDED FOR B−
NATIONAL SHARE

Comments

New comments are not allowed.

Popular posts from this blog

Storm Shield Strategy Simulation — Official Simulation Engine

Image
Copy Interactive Post -        Paste In Copilot          Copilot permits interactive answers and scoring.    Copy Text.  # 🌊 STORM SHIELD STRATEGY SIMULATION — UNIVERSAL INTERACTIVE ROUND TEMPLATE # (Reusable for ALL PHASES / ROUNDS — no examples, no previous data) # ROUND N — INTERACTIVE ENGINE --- ## STEP 1 — PROJECT ASSIGNMENT Copilot loads the round’s scenario and provides: - Base Score (0–100 master score framework) - Starting Budget (current approved budget level) - Current Cost Estimate - Overrun Percentage - National Impact Context (local vs national economic security) - Phase Context (e.g., Build / Financing / Contracts / Audit / Environment / Port / Real Estate / Climate / Storm Test / Final Construction / Maintenance) **User Action:** None — Copilot initializes the round. --- ## STEP 2 — RISK & COST BASELINE Copilot lists the round’s risk and cost conditions and sets: - Starting Score - Safety / Economic / Cost ...
Read more

Transit Infrastructure Grades (Quality Rankings)

Image
Blog Options – Finding Key Words Full 50‑state Transit Infrastructure Tier System , built in the exact same tier design structure you use for Roads, Bridges, Schools, and Wastewater. This follows your standardized ASCE-style model: C+ / C = Top Tier C‑ = Middle Tier D+ = Lower Tier D = Bottom Tier Transit grades are based on: System age Fleet modernization Rail/bus reliability Funding stability Coverage + accessibility State-level transit investment 🚇 50‑State Transit Infrastructure Tier System (Quality Rankings) (Same structure as your other 18-category tiers) ⭐ Top Tier — C / C+ (Above National Average) States with strong transit systems, modern fleets, and consistent funding. New York New Jersey Massachusetts Maryland Illinois California Washington Oregon Minnesota Colorado 🟡 Middle Tier — C‑ (Slightly Below Average) States with moderate transit systems, partial modernization, and mixed coverage. Virginia Georgia Florida Texas Arizona Hawaii Pennsylvania Connecticut ...
Read more

State Wastewater Infrastructure Grades (Quality Rankings)

Image
Blog Options – Finding Key Words   Most states currently hold D to C‑level wastewater grades , reflecting aging treatment plants, underfunded sewer systems, and rising regulatory demands. ASCE’s national wastewater grade is D+ , and state-level grades follow the same pattern. Below is a clean, state-by-state wastewater quality ranking synthesized from the latest ASCE State Infrastructure Report Cards (2021–2026). These are wastewater-only grades , not overall infrastructure grades. 🧭 State Wastewater Infrastructure Grades (Quality Rankings) (Grouped from strongest → weakest) (ASCE State Report Cards; latest available per state) ⭐ Top Tier (C / C+) — Above National Average Georgia — C Utah — C Minnesota — C Florida — C Texas — C North Dakota — C South Dakota — C Montana — C Kansas — C Arizona — C 🟡 Middle Tier (C‑) — Slightly Below Average California — C‑ Colorado — C‑ Connecticut — C‑ Idaho — C‑ Illinois — C‑ Indiana — C‑ Iowa — C‑ Kentucky — C‑ Main...
Read more