Clickable Rail Table

Rail Master Table

Rail Master Table

50-State Rail Infrastructure Profile
ASCE National Rail Grade: B− 2025 SOURCE
State ↕ Current Rail
Spending ↕		 % National
Current Spending ↕		 Additional Spending
Needed for B ↕		 Rail
Grade ↕
Alabama$6.54B1.634%$7.09BC-
Alaska$6.54B1.634%$7.09BC-
Arizona$7.24B1.811%$4.96BC
Arkansas$6.54B1.634%$7.09BC-
California$9.92B2.479%$0.00BB+
Colorado$8.71B2.178%$0.00BB-
Connecticut$8.21B2.053%$0.00BB
Delaware$7.53B1.884%$2.84BC+
Florida$8.71B2.178%$0.00BB-
Georgia$8.71B2.178%$0.00BB-
Hawaii$6.54B1.634%$7.09BC-
Idaho$6.54B1.634%$7.09BC-
Illinois$9.92B2.479%$0.00BB+
Indiana$8.21B2.053%$0.00BB
Iowa$7.53B1.884%$2.84BC+
Kansas$7.53B1.884%$2.84BC+
Kentucky$7.53B1.884%$2.84BC+
Louisiana$7.24B1.811%$4.96BC
Maine$7.08B1.771%$2.84BC+
Maryland$9.03B2.258%$0.00BB
Massachusetts$9.92B2.479%$0.00BB+
Michigan$9.03B2.258%$0.00BB
Minnesota$8.71B2.178%$0.00BB-
Mississippi$6.54B1.634%$7.09BC-
Missouri$7.92B1.980%$0.00BB-
Montana$7.08B1.771%$2.84BC+
Nebraska$7.53B1.884%$2.84BC+
Nevada$7.92B1.980%$0.00BB-
New Hampshire$7.08B1.771%$2.84BC+
New Jersey$9.92B2.479%$0.00BB+
New Mexico$7.53B1.884%$2.84BC+
New York$9.92B2.479%$0.00BB+
North Carolina$7.92B1.980%$0.00BB-
North Dakota$7.08B1.771%$2.84BC+
Ohio$9.03B2.258%$0.00BB
Oklahoma$7.53B1.884%$2.84BC+
Oregon$7.92B1.980%$0.00BB-
Pennsylvania$9.69B2.422%$0.00BB
Rhode Island$7.92B1.980%$0.00BB-
South Carolina$7.53B1.884%$2.84BC+
South Dakota$7.08B1.771%$2.84BC+
Tennessee$7.92B1.980%$0.00BB-
Texas$9.92B2.479%$0.00BB+
Utah$7.92B1.980%$0.00BB-
Vermont$7.08B1.771%$2.84BC+
Virginia$9.03B2.258%$0.00BB
Washington$9.69B2.422%$0.00BB
West Virginia$6.81B1.702%$4.96BC
Wisconsin$7.92B1.980%$0.00BB-
Wyoming$7.08B1.771%$2.84BC+
MODEL DATA NOTICE: ASCE's 2025 national Rail grade is B−. The national Rail spending amount, 50-state Rail grades, and state allocation multipliers in this table are provisional model inputs because they were not supplied in the uploaded Transit source. They are separated from ASCE-published facts and can be replaced without changing the engine.
National Infrastructure Amount: $5.41 Trillion  •  Model National Rail Amount: $400.00B  •  Model B Target: $500.00B  •  Model Additional Requirement: $100.00B
Variable Category-Specific Allocation Percentage: Rail allocations are independently normalized from Rail grade weights and Rail-specific allocation multipliers. The engine does not copy Transit, Energy, Roads, or Hazardous Waste state percentages.
RAIL GRADE
CURRENT RAIL SPENDING
ADDITIONAL NEEDED FOR B
NATIONAL SHARE

Comments

New comments are not allowed.

Popular posts from this blog

Storm Shield Strategy Simulation — Official Simulation Engine

Image
Copy Interactive Post -        Paste In Copilot          Copilot permits interactive answers and scoring.    Copy Text.  # 🌊 STORM SHIELD STRATEGY SIMULATION — UNIVERSAL INTERACTIVE ROUND TEMPLATE # (Reusable for ALL PHASES / ROUNDS — no examples, no previous data) # ROUND N — INTERACTIVE ENGINE --- ## STEP 1 — PROJECT ASSIGNMENT Copilot loads the round’s scenario and provides: - Base Score (0–100 master score framework) - Starting Budget (current approved budget level) - Current Cost Estimate - Overrun Percentage - National Impact Context (local vs national economic security) - Phase Context (e.g., Build / Financing / Contracts / Audit / Environment / Port / Real Estate / Climate / Storm Test / Final Construction / Maintenance) **User Action:** None — Copilot initializes the round. --- ## STEP 2 — RISK & COST BASELINE Copilot lists the round’s risk and cost conditions and sets: - Starting Score - Safety / Economic / Cost ...
Read more

Transit Infrastructure Grades (Quality Rankings)

Image
Aging vehicles — Old fleets causing breakdowns, delays, high costs, poor reliability. Station deterioration — Worn stations reducing safety, accessibility, comfort, and service quality. Maintenance backlogs — Deferred repairs increasing failures, costs, and operational disruptions. Capacity limitations — Insufficient service unable to meet rider demand or growth. Accessibility needs — Missing ADA features restricting mobility for disabled and elderly riders. 🚇 U.S. Transit Infrastructure Tier System (Quality Rankings) Based on Updated Transit Grades You Provided 🟢 TOP TIER — C / C− (Above National Baseline) States with relatively stronger transit systems, lower additional funding gaps, and better operational stability. California — C− Colorado — C− Connecticut — C− Illinois — C− Massachusetts — C− New Hampshire — C− New Jersey — C− ...
Read more

Clickable Transit Table

Transit — 50-State Clickable Master Table — ASCE Maryland Corrected Transit — 50-State Clickable Master Table ASCE State Grade Corrections • D+ National Average • Variable Category-Specific Allocation NATIONAL TRANSIT AVERAGE: D+ — 67.0 ASCE SOURCE 50-STATE MODEL AVERAGE 65.6 — D+ MARYLAND ASCE TRANSIT D+ NEW YORK ASCE TRANSIT D+ B− OR BETTER 0 STATES Reset STATE TITLE ↕ CURRENT TRANSIT SPENDING ↕ % NATIONAL CURRENT SPENDING ↕ ADDITIONAL SPENDING NEEDED FOR B− ↕ GRADE ↕ Alabama $9.42B 2.021% $3.29B D Alaska $8.70B 1.867% $2.93B D Arizona $8.71B 1.868% $2.56B D+ Arkansas $9.44B 2.027% $3.51B D- California $8.79B 1.886% $1.97B C- Colorado $8.63B 1.853% $2.26B C- Connecticut $8.06B 1.729% $1.81B C- Delaware $7.70B 1.653% $2.15B D+ Florida $10.05B 2.156% $2.96B D+ Georgia $9.78B 2.100% $3.16B D Hawaii $8.70B 1.867% $2.93B D Idaho $8.95B 1.920% $3.12B D Illinois $9.10B 1.954% $2.22B C- Indiana $9.52B 2.043% $3.21B D Iowa $8.95B 1.92...
Read more