Clickable Leeves Table

Levees — 50-State Clickable Master Table — Recalculated

Levees — 50-State Clickable Master Table

Complete State-by-State Levees Infrastructure Allocation
ASCE National Levees Grade: D+ — 2025SOURCE
STATE TITLE ↕CURRENT LEVEES
SPENDING ↕		% NATIONAL
CURRENT SPENDING ↕		ADDITIONAL SPENDING
NEEDED FOR B− ↕		GRADE ↕
Alabama$0.18B2.557%$3.25BD+
Alaska$0.15B2.177%$3.07BD+
Arizona$0.15B2.184%$2.43BC-
Arkansas$0.18B2.639%$3.54BD+
California$0.16B2.238%$1.33BC
Colorado$0.14B1.958%$1.62BC
Connecticut$0.12B1.657%$0.54BC+
Delaware$0.08B1.188%$0.00BB-
Florida$0.18B2.517%$2.34BC
Georgia$0.15B2.109%$2.16BC-
Hawaii$0.10B1.386%$0.24BC+
Idaho$0.12B1.650%$1.18BC
Illinois$0.17B2.474%$2.95BC-
Indiana$0.14B2.033%$1.89BC
Iowa$0.14B2.062%$1.48BC
Kansas$0.13B1.848%$1.89BC-
Kentucky$0.18B2.639%$3.54BD+
Louisiana$0.26B3.729%$6.67BD-
Maine$0.09B1.320%$0.00BB-
Maryland$0.08B1.205%$0.00BB
Massachusetts$0.08B1.188%$0.00BB-
Michigan$0.15B2.184%$2.43BC-
Minnesota$0.13B1.897%$0.89BC+
Mississippi$0.25B3.543%$6.01BD-
Missouri$0.18B2.557%$3.25BD+
Montana$0.12B1.716%$1.42BC
Nebraska$0.16B2.227%$2.07BC
Nevada$0.11B1.584%$0.94BC
New Hampshire$0.08B1.122%$0.00BB
New Jersey$0.11B1.581%$0.27BC+
New Mexico$0.16B2.309%$3.54BD
New York$0.14B1.958%$1.62BC
North Carolina$0.14B1.979%$1.18BC
North Dakota$0.13B1.815%$0.59BC+
Ohio$0.17B2.474%$2.95BC-
Oklahoma$0.19B2.722%$3.84BD+
Oregon$0.10B1.431%$0.00BB-
Pennsylvania$0.16B2.309%$2.36BC-
Rhode Island$0.07B1.056%$0.00BB
South Carolina$0.15B2.144%$1.77BC
South Dakota$0.10B1.386%$0.24BC+
Tennessee$0.17B2.392%$2.66BC-
Texas$0.21B2.984%$4.00BD+
Utah$0.06B0.924%$0.00BB
Vermont$0.06B0.792%$0.00BB+
Virginia$0.12B1.657%$0.54BC+
Washington$0.10B1.485%$0.00BB-
West Virginia$0.25B3.636%$6.34BD-
Wisconsin$0.12B1.732%$0.81BC+
Wyoming$0.12B1.650%$1.18BC
50 / 50 STATES POPULATED — Every state title is explicitly included.
LOCKED NATIONAL GRADE: The official ASCE 2025 Levees grade remains D+. It is a national assessment and is not the average of the 50 modeled state grades. ASCE reports 23 million Americans live and work behind levees, with more than 24,000 miles in the National Levee Database; nearly two-thirds have not been assessed for community risk. citeturn0search8
RECALCULATED STATE-GRADE METHOD: State grades are now independently model-derived. They are based on levee-specific condition/safety readiness, flood-risk exposure, rehabilitation pressure, management/assessment pressure, and state-specific levee risk factors. They are not ASCE-published state grades and are not populated simply with C+/C.
B− TARGET RULE: B− = 80 points. States modeled at B−, B, B+, A−, A, or A+ receive $0.00B additional spending and a yellow grade highlight. States below B− receive a calculated amount from the ASCE Levees funding-gap baseline.
ASCE Levees investment baseline: Needs $97B • Funded 2024–33 $7B • Funding Gap $91B. citeturn0search7
Variable Category-Specific Allocation Percentage: Each state's Levees percentage is independently normalized from its Levees deficiency index × Levees-specific risk multiplier. The Levees pattern is not copied from Dams, Bridges, Transit, Rail, Ports, Roads, Water, Wastewater, Stormwater, Aviation, Broadband, Solid Waste, or another category.
Modeled grade distribution: B+: 1 • B: 4 • B-: 5 • C+: 8 • C: 13 • C-: 8 • D+: 7 • D: 1 • D-: 3
B− or better states (10): Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Oregon, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, Washington

MODELED LEVEES GRADE
CURRENT MODELED SPENDING
ADDITIONAL NEEDED FOR B−
NATIONAL SHARE

Comments

New comments are not allowed.

Popular posts from this blog

Storm Shield Strategy Simulation — Official Simulation Engine

Image
Copy Interactive Post -        Paste In Copilot          Copilot permits interactive answers and scoring.    Copy Text.  # 🌊 STORM SHIELD STRATEGY SIMULATION — UNIVERSAL INTERACTIVE ROUND TEMPLATE # (Reusable for ALL PHASES / ROUNDS — no examples, no previous data) # ROUND N — INTERACTIVE ENGINE --- ## STEP 1 — PROJECT ASSIGNMENT Copilot loads the round’s scenario and provides: - Base Score (0–100 master score framework) - Starting Budget (current approved budget level) - Current Cost Estimate - Overrun Percentage - National Impact Context (local vs national economic security) - Phase Context (e.g., Build / Financing / Contracts / Audit / Environment / Port / Real Estate / Climate / Storm Test / Final Construction / Maintenance) **User Action:** None — Copilot initializes the round. --- ## STEP 2 — RISK & COST BASELINE Copilot lists the round’s risk and cost conditions and sets: - Starting Score - Safety / Economic / Cost ...
Read more

Transit Infrastructure Grades (Quality Rankings)

Image
Aging vehicles — Old fleets causing breakdowns, delays, high costs, poor reliability. Station deterioration — Worn stations reducing safety, accessibility, comfort, and service quality. Maintenance backlogs — Deferred repairs increasing failures, costs, and operational disruptions. Capacity limitations — Insufficient service unable to meet rider demand or growth. Accessibility needs — Missing ADA features restricting mobility for disabled and elderly riders. 🚇 U.S. Transit Infrastructure Tier System (Quality Rankings) Based on Updated Transit Grades You Provided 🟢 TOP TIER — C / C− (Above National Baseline) States with relatively stronger transit systems, lower additional funding gaps, and better operational stability. California — C− Colorado — C− Connecticut — C− Illinois — C− Massachusetts — C− New Hampshire — C− New Jersey — C− ...
Read more

Clickable Transit Table

Transit — 50-State Clickable Master Table — ASCE Maryland Corrected Transit — 50-State Clickable Master Table ASCE State Grade Corrections • D+ National Average • Variable Category-Specific Allocation NATIONAL TRANSIT AVERAGE: D+ — 67.0 ASCE SOURCE 50-STATE MODEL AVERAGE 65.6 — D+ MARYLAND ASCE TRANSIT D+ NEW YORK ASCE TRANSIT D+ B− OR BETTER 0 STATES Reset STATE TITLE ↕ CURRENT TRANSIT SPENDING ↕ % NATIONAL CURRENT SPENDING ↕ ADDITIONAL SPENDING NEEDED FOR B− ↕ GRADE ↕ Alabama $9.42B 2.021% $3.29B D Alaska $8.70B 1.867% $2.93B D Arizona $8.71B 1.868% $2.56B D+ Arkansas $9.44B 2.027% $3.51B D- California $8.79B 1.886% $1.97B C- Colorado $8.63B 1.853% $2.26B C- Connecticut $8.06B 1.729% $1.81B C- Delaware $7.70B 1.653% $2.15B D+ Florida $10.05B 2.156% $2.96B D+ Georgia $9.78B 2.100% $3.16B D Hawaii $8.70B 1.867% $2.93B D Idaho $8.95B 1.920% $3.12B D Illinois $9.10B 1.954% $2.22B C- Indiana $9.52B 2.043% $3.21B D Iowa $8.95B 1.92...
Read more